RESUMO
Identifying the state of the art of care genealogy through publications in national and international journals. Method: this is an integrative review of the process in health care and nursing, preceded between 10th February, 2014 and 20th February, 2014, in the Medline, Lilacs and SciELO of data portals VHL and CAPES. Article 17 was explored and the results were grouped into two categories: the Archeological and Genealogical methods proposed by Michel Foucault and Considerations knowledge and practices of health care and nursing. Results: the care and its relationships have transversality in ways of caring in different forms and spaces. The transversality becomes evident when it comes to body care with direct, indirect and contextual mode, evoking shared knowledge and complex actions. Conclusion: it is necessary to reflect on the production of self-care and implications for health activities, including the philosophy of power involved in this process...
Identificar o estado da arte sobre genealogia do cuidado através das publicações em periódicos nacionais e internacionais. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa sobre o processo do cuidarem saúde e enfermagem, procedida entre 10/02/2014 e 20/02/2014 nas bases de dados Medline, Lilacs e Scielo dos portais da BVS e CAPES. Explorou-se 17 artigos, cujos resultados foram agrupados em duas categorias: os métodos Arqueológicos e Genealógicos propostos por Michel Foucault e Considerações sobre saberes e práticas de cuidado em saúde e na Enfermagem. Resultados: o cuidado e suas relações possuem transversalidade nas maneiras de cuidar em distintas formas e espaços. A transversalidade evidencia-se quando se trata do cuidado com corpo de modo direto, indireto e contextual, evocando ações saberes e ações complexas. Conclusão: é necessário refletir sobre as produções do cuidado de si e as implicações com as atividades na saúde, compreendendo a filosofia do poder envolvido nesse processo...
Identificar el estado de la arte acerca de genealogía de la atención a través de las publicaciones en revistas nacionales e internacionales. Método: se trata de una revisión integradora del proceso de atención de la salud en enfermería, procedida entre 10/02/2014 y 20/02/2014 en el Medline, Lilacs y SciELO de los portales BVS y CAPES. Exploró se a los 17 artículos, cuyos resultados se agruparon en dos categorías: Los métodos Arqueológicos y Genealógicos propuestos por Michel Foucault y Consideraciones acerca de los conocimientos y prácticas de atención de la salud y de la Enfermería. Resultados: la atención y sus relaciones tienen transversalidad de maneras de cuidar en diferentes formas y espacios. La transversalidad se hace evidente cuando trata de cuidado corporal con modo directo, indirecto y contextual, evocando las acciones conocimientos y acciones complejas. Conclusión: es necesario reflexionar acerca de las producciones de auto-cuidado y las implicaciones para actividades de salud, incluyendo la filosofía de poder participar en este proceso...
Assuntos
Humanos , Cuidados de Enfermagem/métodos , Cuidados de Enfermagem/tendências , Cuidados de Enfermagem , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , BrasilRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up in clinical reviews often presents significant difficulty with conventional medical records alone. Publicly accessible genealogical databases such as Ancestry.com provide another avenue for obtaining extended follow-up and added outcome information. No previous studies have described the use of genealogical databases in the follow-up of individual patients. METHODS: Ancestry.com, the largest genealogical database in the United States, houses extensive demographic data on an increasing number of Americans. In a recent retrospective review of esthesioneuroblastoma patients treated at our institution, we used this resource to ascertain the outcomes of patients otherwise lost to follow-up. Additional information such as quality of life and supplemental treatments the patient may have received at home was obtained through direct contact with living relatives. RESULTS: The use of Ancestry.com resulted in a 25% increase (20 months) in follow-up duration as well as incorporation of an additional 7 patients in our study (18%) who would otherwise not have had adequate hospital chart data for inclusion. Many patients within this subset had more advanced disease or were remotely located from our institution. As such, exclusion of these outliers can impact the quality of subsequent outcome analysis. CONCLUSION: Online genealogical databases provide a unique resource of public information that is acceptable to institutional review boards for patient follow-up in clinical reviews. Utilization of Ancestry.com data led to significant improvement in follow-up duration and increased the number of patients with sufficient data that could be included in our retrospective study.
